Was Your Loved Ones’ Case Negatively Impacted by Ineffective Assistance of Counsel?

Confused attorney

Our office gets many questions about the topic of ineffective assistance of counsel.  In this short blog, we’re going to attempt to provide a bit more clarity on this complex issue. (NOTE: There are many, many more complexities to the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel than we can outline in a blog; please reach out and contact our office for a free consultation to discuss your particular case.)

What is a U.S.C. § 2255 Motion?

The most important thing to know is that a defendant only gets ONE SHOT at filing a U.S.C. § 2255 motion except in rare cases where new evidence is found, or the Supreme Court makes an extraordinary ruling that changes the process of similar cases. This means that you are taking a BIG risk by using consultants or paralegals or anyone other than an experienced attorney to file a motion like this. We strongly encourage you to reach out and contact our office for a free consultation with one of our knowledgeable professionals to get more information and a quote for services. 

The accurate preparation and execution of a § 2255 motion is without a doubt the most important part of the process. Once the process is initiated, later motions can be argued, re-written and re-submitted, but to have your case receive a summary dismissal due to a bad first filing cannot be easily fixed. That is why we strongly urge you to hire experienced, competent, hands-on attorneys to help you and your loved one with this important process. It can (and often does) make the difference between success and failure.

Q: “What Exactly is a Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion?

A § 2255 motion is essentially a non-direct appeal. Direct appeals are those entered immediately after a conviction. This type of appeal is a collateral attack on the sentence of incarceration itself for constitutional issues.

Q:“Who Can File a § 2255 Motion?”

To answer this question, we start with 3 main criteria:

  1. Only federal inmates may file
  2. Complaints cannot be made if they could have been made on direct appeal
  3. Complaints must be an attack on the conviction or sentence themselves, not issues related to confinement (such as Residential Drug Abuse Program (RDAP) acceptance, placement in halfway house, or holdings in Solitary/SHU)

Q: How Long Do I Have to File a § 2255 Motion?

Next, there is a one-year time frame in which a § 2255 can be made; however, this timeframe is based on one of four dynamics:

  1. One year from the date of the final judgement OR
  2. One year from the removal of obstacles to filing OR
  3. One year from a Supreme Court ruling that impacts a defendant’s case OR
  4. One year from the date of when facts are discovered that make it possible to file the motion

Normally, cases in the federal criminal system have a direct appeal. But when the direct appeal did not work, was never filed, does not have the ability to work, or simply will not meet the needs of the defendant, a § 2255 is often the way to go. We strongly encourage you to reach out and contact our office for a free consultation with one of our knowledgeable professionals to get more information and a quote for services. 

Q: “What Does Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Really Mean?”

One of the most commonly used ‘triggers’ as a basis for filing a § 2255 motion is the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Here’s how it works: the Sixth Amendment of our Constitution guarantees everyone the right to an effective lawyer if you are charged with a crime in Federal Court. A § 2255 motion is how a defendant claims that their lawyer gave them ineffective assistance of counsel, BUT they must show two things:

  • First – to establish ineffective assistance of counsel, you must show ‘deficient performance’ or a gross deviation of the standard of care, among other things. This means that you must show that your lawyer didn’t perform as well as he should have, thus providing ineffective assistance of counsel. By way of example, if a lawyer who is typically good at his job goes out and interviews a witness to prepare for your case, but your lawyer failed to do that – AND you can show it – then that’s how you can make this failure obvious. Another example of ineffective assistance of counsel would be if you asked your lawyer to file a notice of appeal and they did not.
  • Second – you have to show that your attorney’s error based on ineffective assistance of counsel MATTERED – or ‘caused prejudice’. Continuing with the example above, if your lawyer didn’t talk to a witness and by failing to do so, there was a reasonable likelihood that there would have been a different result in your case, that supports the concept that your attorney’s ineffective assistance of counsel negatively impacted your case. If, however, your lawyer failed to talk to a witness who likely would not have testified anyway or had no helpful information to add to your case, then your point is not proven. 

Other examples of ineffective assistance of counsel may include:

  • Defense Attorneys who do not mention or fight for sentencing adjustments or who offer no evidence with their sentencing enhancement objections
  • Defense Attorneys who give their clients poor advice on whether to take a plea or to go to trial, which impact the defendant’s understanding of their plea or decision to go to trial
  • Defense Attorneys who fail to raise important issues during the original prosecution

SUMMARY: § 2255 Motions

In summary, § 2255 motions are an extremely complex area of the law and should not be taken lightly. If you intend to raise this argument on your own, we cannot strongly enough urge you to be careful. We have seen and heard stories of how poorly drafted and argued petitions can, and have, resulted in negative outcomes for the defendant. 

Please, reach out to our office for a free consultation with one of our compassionate and helpful professionals. We can provide you with information and a quote for services that will help you decide if this course of action is right for you and your loved one. 

About the Law Office of Jeremy Gordon:

Located in the Dallas/Fort Worth Area, the Law Office of Jeremy Gordon has been an award winning federal criminal defense firm since 2012. We have had favorable outcomes in more than 70 cases in the past four years. Our entire staff is committed to providing excellent service to our clients and their families. We encourage you to contact our office today to visit with us on how we might be able to help you or your loved one get the representation they deserve. You can also add us on Facebook or Twitter.  You can sign up for our newsletter below.

Managing COVID-19 – December BOP Oversight Hearing

On December 2, 2020, the House Judiciary Committee of Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security held an Oversight Hearing on the Federal Bureau of Prisons and Marshal’s Service on how they are managing COVID-19. During this hearing, the committee questioned BOP Director Michael Carvajal and USMS Director Donald Washington on the progression of COVID-19 within their institutions.

Read More »