What is Federal Drug Trafficking and Distribution?
Federal Drug Distribution
Federal law makes it a crime to distribute a controlled substance. The law provides that to “” means “to deliver (other than administering or dispensing) a controlled substance or a listed chemical.” Because of this, the terms Trafficking and Distribution will be used interchangeably.
When the public normally considers the term distribution, the public usually thinks of large scale drug dealers or violent gangs. And while these are definitely examples, federal drug conspiracy can also extend to other groups as well, including:
- A small group of people working together to prepare and sell methamphetamine in a small town
- A single person accused of possessing cocaine, methamphetamine and large sums of cash
- A person working as an intermediary to supply others with cocaine and crack.
- A person working with others to have methamphetamine delivered through the mail.
Federal Possession with Intent to Distribute
In addition, federal authorities can charge a person possession with “intent to distribute” drugs. This is a separate type of crime that can include stiff penalties. Intent can be inferred by the types of evidence present and the circumstances involved with the case. Police can use the following in order to determine if a person has the intent to deliver a controlled substance:
- Large amounts of drugs present
- Large amounts of cash present
- Ledgers or other records indicating the amount of drugs or monies that are outstanding
- Drugs present with firearms and other types of weapons
What is a Controlled Substance?
What is the Difference Between State and Federal Drug Trafficking and Distribution Crimes?
Every state has laws that prohibit drug trafficking and distribution. Many drug trafficking cases are handled by local jurisdictions and state prosecutors. The United States congress has the power to regulate any activity that pertains to interstate commerce. This is given broad interpretation and encompasses many federal crimes, including drug trafficking.
In situations where the defendant is an individual, the government can charge a person in federal court when:
The accused person is being investigated and accused by a federal agency: The Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), ad United States Postal Service (USPS) all investigate federal crimes. If you are accused of a crime by one of these agencies, you may find yourself in federal court. In addition, many local police officers work on Federal Drug Task forces to share resources.
The accused person is charged with moving drugs or their ingredients across state or federal lines: Many drugs are not prepared in the continental United States. Transporting them in either their finished form or in preparatory pieces across state lines or into the country from another place may be sufficient to charge a person with a federal crime.
An informant cooperated against an alleged drug conspiracy: As previously indicated, drug conspiracies may involve many people and substantial amounts of drugs. Law enforcement works to bust these conspiracies by charging lower level individuals with crimes that involve mandatory minimums in order to get them to cooperate against other individuals in the conspiracy in exchange for various benefits.
Federal Prosecutors exercise their discretion to go after an accused person: The prosecutors have a great deal of power to decide who to charge with a crime and how to charge them. In many cases, prosecutors will take cases of particular importance, cases where death or serious bodily injury results, individuals with prior offenses, or other cases that the prosecutors believe to be a case of particular interest.
Penalties for Drug Trafficking Charges in Federal Court
Under normal circumstances, without the application of statutory mandatory minimums or increased guideline ranges due to special conditions, a person can be sentenced to a term of punishment up to twenty years for drug trafficking and distribution charges.
Statutory Mandatory Minimums on Drug Trafficking and Distribution Charges
Mandatory Minimum of 5 – 40 years
Our laws provide that if a person is indicted and found guilty of the following types of crimes, a statutory mandatory minimum of five to forty years applies:
- 100 grams or more of heroin;
- 500 grams or more of powder cocaine;
- 28 grams or more of cocaine base (crack);
- 10 grams or more of pure phencyclidine (PCP);
- 1 gram or more of LSD;
- 100 kilograms or more of marijuana; or
- 5 grams or more of pure methamphetamine
- 50 grams of mixture or substance containing methamphetamine
An individual can be ordered to pay a fine of up to $5,000,000 under these circumstances.
An individual found guilty under this part of the law is subject to a term of supervised release of at least 4 years. If the individual had a prior conviction, then the court must impose a term of supervised release of at least 8 years.
Mandatory Minimum of 10 years – Life
Our laws provide that if a person is indicted and found guilty of the following types of crimes a statutory mandatory minimum of ten years applies:
- 1 kilogram or more of heroin
- 5 kilograms or more of powder cocaine
- 280 grams or more of cocaine base (crack)
- 100 grams or more of pure phencyclidine (PCP)
- 1 Kilogram or more of a mixture containing phencyclidine (PCP)
- 10 grams or more of LSD
- 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana
- 1,000 or more marijuana plants
- 50 grams or more of pure methamphetamine
- 500 grams or more of a mixture of methamphetamine
In addition, an individual can be ordered to pay a fine of up to $10,000,000 under these circumstances. A person may be subject to a statutory mandatory minimum of life imprisonment if death or serious bodily injury occurs due to the use of the drugs in the case.
In addition, an individual found guilty under this part of the law is subject to a term of supervised release of at least 5 years. If the individual had a prior conviction, then the court must impose a term of supervised release of at least 10 years.
School Zones and Statutory Mandatory Minimums
The statutory mandatory minimums can be doubled here if the crime was near a “school zone.” This has a very broad interpretation and can include:
- Private Schools
- Public Schools
- Secondary School
- Junior College
- Public Swimming Pools
- Video Arcade Facilities
Prior Convictions and Statutory Mandatory Minimums
Our laws provide that a person can be subject to further mandatory minimums if they have been previously convicted of a “serious drug felony” or a “serious violent felony.” The applicable “serious” prior felony must be a crime for which a defendant served at least 12 months and occurred less than 15 years ago. Further, to be “serious” the offense must be punishable by a term of 10 years or more.
Serious Bodily Injury Or Death and Statutory Mandatory Minimums
A person may be subject to a statutory mandatory minimum of life imprisonment if death or serious bodily injury occurs due to the use of the drugs in the case. This is something that must be either pled guilty to or found by a judge or jury listening to the case in the context of a trial. There are important Supreme Court cases that impact this issue so please reach out to our office for more information.
Federal Sentencing Guidelines Impact on Drug Trafficking and Distribution Charges
Separate from statutory mandatory minimums, the Federal Sentencing Guidelines substantially impact sentencing in a federal drug case. These are issues that might not be immediately apparent to individuals charged with crimes because their lawyer may not tell them. In our time as a criminal defense firm, we find it vital to understand these things as soon as possible in the litigation and explain their significance to the client.
The guidelines put forth by the United States Sentencing Commission can adjust the advisory guideline range higher or lower based on factors learned during the case. Examples of things that can raise the guideline range include:
- How much drugs are attributable to the accused person.
- Whether the drugs were imported from another country.
- If the accused person was a leader/organizer in the criminal activity.
- If death results from drug trafficking.
- If the drugs were imported from another country.
- If the accused person kept a residence to house the drugs (a “stash house”).
- Whether the accused person carried a firearm in furtherance of the drug trafficking.
- Whether there was a person under 18 years of age involved in the criminal activity.
- Whether the accused person gave false statements to impede the investigation.
- Whether the accused person engaged in criminal activity near a school
- Whether the person has a prior conviction for a felony
Examples of things that can lower the guideline range include:
- Whether the accused person engaged in substantial cooperation before they were found guilty
- Whether the accused person had a minor role in the criminal activity.
- Whether the person was subject to safety valve relief.
All convictions of this type come with a term of supervised release. Additional conditions may be required here such as electronic monitoring, drug classes and further education. This may be reduced after a year of serving supervised release.
Federal drug trafficking convictions cannot be expunged or erased, even with a . In addition, there are substantial “collateral consequences” such as the inability to receive certain jobs or licensing from the state, possible denial of federal benefits and the stigma of a criminal conviction.
Defenses to Federal Drug Charges:
Federal drug charges sometimes result from a simple traffic stop by police. After performing a search of the vehicle, the police officer may find a large amount of money or illegal drugs concealed in the car. In federal drug possession cases, one possible defense is that the defendant lacked personal knowledge of the presence of the drugs.
Many federal drug charges involve the sale of illegal drugs to a government informant or an undercover police officer. Entrapment may be an available defense in such cases. This defense is available when a government agent induces someone to commit a crime that they were not predisposed to doing.
Federal drug charges involving possession with the intent to distribute can sometimes be defended on the ground that the amount of drugs involved were for personal use. This defense is based on the elements of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), which require that the quantity of drugs be sufficient to constitute a distributable amount, and that the person “intended” to distribute the drugs.
The federal government frequently relies on the concept of “conspiracy” to bring federal drug charges against individuals. To convict someone of conspiracy, the government does not need any physical evidence, such as seized drugs or large amounts of money.
This crime of conspiracy is based on the “agreement” of two or more persons, whether known or not known to the defendant, to perform the object of the conspiracy. The object of the conspiracy can vary, but usually takes the form of possession with the intent to distribute drugs, distribution alone, or importation of illegal drugs.
Federal drug conspiracy cases are challenging to defend and require an experienced attorney. We know how to attack the credibility of the government’s witnesses and fight vigorously for your innocence.
If there was an illegal search warrant in the case, there may be a defense based on inadequacy of the police affidavit used to obtain the warrant. Untimely execution of the search warrant may also be used as a defense. In some federal drug cases, police may attempt to use a warrant where the information creating probable cause is “stale” because it involves events that occurred weeks or even months prior to the search for illegal drugs. A federal criminal defense attorney may also be able to challenge whether a search warrant was supported by probable cause. This happens when the warrant contains insufficient information as to the exact place to be searched and the exact type of drugs that were expected to be found.
If there was a search involving a police dog, a defense may be brought as to the admissibility of drug evidence found if the dog was not properly trained, if the dog did not have any record of success in prior drug recognition, and if the dog’s handler was not properly trained. If a police dog can be shown to be unreliable, there may be a lack of probable cause for a search.
Hire The Federal Drug Trafficking Defense Lawyers at The Law Office of Jeremy Gordon Today!
At the Law Office of Jeremy Gordon, we fight aggressively for our clients. We are experienced with federal drug charges, and know what it takes to present a in a federal criminal case. Safeguarding our clients’ rights, and properly managing their defense, are two of the most important parts of our job. If you are charged with a federal drug case,